Why I support and feel the US citizens should support ‘Donald Trump’ (The U.S. Presidential election 2016)

Before I could get into debate analysis I thought of writing about something which I feel is very crucial topic, something which would not be noticed by an ordinary voters with the importance it actually carries to decide the direction of the upcoming U.S. Election.

This is about Trump’s comments being the U.S. Presidential Election being rigged. Barack Obama was quick to react on this. Why? The answer is very simple yet astounding. There is a HUGE VESTED FINANCIAL INTEREST involved in the result of this election. The financial interest of the capitalists industrialists who don’t care about what their fellow countrymen suffers through but only about their own bank balance and properties worldwide. And I am sure that all these industrialists would not mind to spend huge amount of money to decide the result of this election in the favor of their own vested interest so that the democratic government which would come to the power would print more money and fuel it to run their businesses and INVESTMENTS worldwide. I am not sure if the ordinary U.S. citizens understands this very well, but this democratic government printed trillions of money out of public finance causing a huge toll on the U.S. public debt to favor con investment banks and corporates to run and expand their businesses worldwide and invest in stock markets, real estates, gold and bullions, while the local U.S. citizen being deprived of the basic right to fetch an employment and support to him/ her and his family, leave achieving their own dreams. WHOSE MONEY IT IS? IT BELONGS TO CITIZENS OF THE US. THE PEOPLE WHO CONTRIBUTE TO THE TAX & TREASURY. I would also like to mention here the fact that if Donald Trump has smartly avoided paying tax within the scope of existing taxation law (which I believe is every citizen’s right to protect his/ her hard earned money by utilizing the provisions of the law applicable to EVERYONE), Mr. Trump has made a wise decision by not contributing his tax money to the fund which is highly misutilized by the government so far, be it George Bush’s or Mr. Barack Obama’s administration.  And who is the real beneficiary of all this money, TOP WEALTHY BUT ONLY SMALL PROPORTION OF THE POPULATION OF THE COUNTRY. The most important psychological and yet misleading factor of the modern election which I came across since BREXIT memorandum is the GENERAL PUBLIC POLL. It would not be tough for a person of average reasoning mind to understand that these numbers affect the psychology of normal voters, especially voters who have not made up their mind to vote yet (i.e. undecided category) and also to the voters who have barely made up a decision to vote in favor of one or the other candidate or decision. It is like a BIG CASINO house being run displaying numbers for public to bet on and also most importantly to affect their psychology to make up mind to be with the largest chunk of people and go with the flow. If the GENERAL PUBLIC WANT TO CHANGE THE COURSE OF THE ELECTION AND THE WAY ECONOMY IS MANAGED IN COMMON INTEREST OF THE LARGE GROUP OF PEOPLE MAKING THEM BELIEVE THAT THEY ARE FOOLS TO THINK OF SWIMMING AGAINST THE CURRENT/ FLOW. IT IS A METHOD TO DISCONNECT BRAINS OF PEOPLE WHO THINK OF COMMON INTREST TO CHANGE THE LIFE FOR THEMSELVES, FOR THEIR FAMILIES AND TAKE CONTROL OF THEIR DESTINY. It is no wonder that most people still fall into the category of undecided. Guys! Poll results are the numbers which could be manipulated. Just like many economic performance results could be manipulated. If not manipulated at least window dressing could be done to mislead the perception of the general public. But the ground reality does not change by changing numbers. Many experts are questioning if the poll results being announced are even genuine or not. Who is checking the authenticity of those numbers and the method in which those are collected.  One should not forget that before BREXIT VOTE actually happened most polls were in the favor Britain to remain in the EU. But the U.K. citizens showed their determination is very strong and won comfortably with convincing majority. THERE IS NO WONDER IF Mr. TRUMP said THAT THE ELECTION HAS BEEN RIGGED. I support Mr. Trump!

Look at what BREXIT has done to the U.K. citizens and the life in the United Kingdom. Certainly corporations are affected due to the disconnection of free access to the largest consumer base of the European citizens but I am sure that the mass U.K. citizens would be living with pride now knowing that their LONG TERM and FUTURE GENERATION interest is protected. And the government would be working in the U.K. public interest with enough freedom, authority and OBLIGATION to the U.K. citizens.

Why should not I support Mr. Trump?
Look at the campaign expenditure of Mr. Trump and Mrs. Clinton. If Mr. Trump has spent 71% of its funds generated ($166 milliion), which were  as compared to 90% by Hillary Clinton whose party generated ($414 million)….(source: https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/politics/2016-election/campaign-finance/).

Who has SPENT LESS MONEY on THE ELECTION CAMPAIGNING?
Who has SPENT MONEY MOST EFFECTIVELY?
Answer is Mr. Trump.
That means whom the U.S. citizens would like to trust with their Tax Revenue and Public Finances? Of course Mr. Trump.

On the contrary who is the most expensive candidate and had to spend huge amount of money to gather votes? Mrs. Hillary Clinton!
Should the U.S. citizens trust this lady to achieve their dreams? No. She could only be trusted to bring benefits to the few rich and wealthy people who have poured huge amount of money to ensure that she is being elected.

Again I feel that Mr. Trump is not wrong, when he said that the election is rigged.

I have observed Hillary Clinton most of the times and since the early stages of the election running a campaign by directly criticizing Mr. Trump for some personal and past life behavior, criticizing him for his act of tax avoidance (although it was within the scope of the law and is a right offered to every citizen by the law equally). Whereas Mr. Trump has been running campaign on bringing change to the benefit of mass U.S. citizens and laws (including taxation) to increase the ease with which the U.S. citizen can live his/ her life. To increase the ease with which business could be run LOCALLY.

YES!!! I support Mr. Donald Trump!

Last and not the least, before I could sign off for the day, my personal feeling and perception about Mrs. Hillary Clinton about campaigning is whining lady making arguments like person who has failed in own venture and all she could do is to try to throw more garbage on Mr. Donald Trump while she herself is fully covered under garbage!!! She acted as a Senator. Played active role in forming various policies and what the result it brought to the U.S. citizens? …Well look around you and in the neighborhood!!!

To be continued…

Why I support and feel the US citizens should support ‘Donald Trump’ (The U.S. Presidential election 2016) - 20 Oct 2016

Continued from yesterday…

Finally Mr. President Barack Obama broke the silence. Where went those words ‘when they go low you go high!!!’ Evaporated in the air just like the stimulus money printed and vanished into the pockets of big fat capitalist to push into economies worldwide but the U.S..

Mr. Obama breaking silence is itself an indication that Mr. Donald Trump is making noticeable progress, and Mr. President must have thought to try to obstacle Mr. Trump’s progress by giving another good speech.

I expect the U.S. citizens to follow the path of British Citizens who made a historical decision to exit of EU. And take maximum control of its own economy. Although the USA is not part of any union it has to come out of unfavorable international trade agreements which are detrimental to its local employment.  Who could do this? I believe Mr. Trump. I would also like to mention here about Mrs. Hillary Clinton. The way she has been debating with Mr. Donald Trump, it seems that she wants to win by proving his inability and socially unacceptable behavior rather than proving and assuring her voters and supporters about her own ability to run the greatest country in the world by becoming Commander-in-chief? Most times of the election campaign when Mr. Donald Trump is actually running his campaign all over the nation, Mrs. Hillary Clinton chose to stay at home and rest. Folks, do you really expect the Commander-in-chief to be of this nature? Also the lady in whose presence, Mr. Bill Clinton did what he did; the lady who is always appearing in the campaign as if a quarreling and complaining lady, the lady who failed to keep her own husband within socially acceptable behavioral limits,…do you really think she is capable of playing a role of the US President? I believe, certainly not.

Addressing Trump's allegations of "large scale voter fraud," Obama said, "There's no evidence that that has happened in the past, or that there are instances in which that will happen this time." I would like to ask the Citizens of the U.S., that does it mean that if crime has happened and evidence could not be gathered, indicates the Crime never happened? There should be proper and independentaudit of election and vote counting procedures. 

My best wishes to Mr. Trump for his last debate tonight and I am confident that he would win!!!

In my next few blogs I would try to provide my own analysis of pre-election debate from 1^st till the last one that is happening tomorrow. I just wish to make a sincere appeal  to the people of the USA, to make a best choice in the interest of their self, their families and friends, the USA itself and consequently for the betterment of the entire world.

A non-political person, a successful businessman has taken the first step to contest for the election to take back the control of the USA, the next step has to be taken by the Citizens of the USA. 

Why I support and feel the US citizens should support ‘Donald Trump’ (The U.S. Presidential election 2016)

Looking at current state of the U.S. economy after 8 years of Obama administration being on the power, who printed trillions of money to give away to the corporate world of the US where the LONG and CONCRETE benefits have barely reached the common man and economy not showing promising long term picture,  I feel the U.S. and eventually the world needs a change in the way global economies are being run. The US could hoist the flag of leadership again bringing change to  the way global economies are being run. And I see that change could be brought only by a persona like Donald Trump, who is less of a politician and more of an entrepreneur and A SUCCESSFUL ENTREPRENEURE! Compared to him if Hillary Clinton comes to the power, it would be more of a continuation of policies which are being run since last 8 years and the most U.S. citizens especially from middle and low income would be deprived of long term financial stability to themselves and to their families.

The idea of Donald Trump of building protected U.S. economy and thereby grow stronger sound very promising than letting the show run as it has been running now and probably on a wider scale where more jobs are outsourced to developing countries where those cost less than creating jobs in the society where the company belongs and supposed to be giving back to that society. Donald Trump has sounded so far very simple, straightforward and bold enough to take necessary measures required to get back jobs in the U.S. economy from the long term perspective. Even if the oppositions and economists are saying that he would add 5-10 trillions of dollars to the public budget deficit (which has already been to extremely high level), I would like to ask simple question to democrats about what has happened to those trillions of dollars which Obama administration printed under the claim of economic stimulus to lead to the benefit of common man. As per the latest news, although the unemployment in the US has gone low and to the level of near full employment, what is the percentage of full time jobs being created in last few months of this election year? I believe most jobs are temporary and in a contract role. That means chances are very high that post this election if democrats come back in the power, those jobs would be lost very soon if economy does not pick up as it should be. It did not in last 8 years, I wonder how it would in next 1-2 years if not 4 under the new leadership? Donald Trump’s policy is more direct in terms of creating employment in the U.S. in terms that those would encourage and financially FORCE entrepreneurs and organization to create more local employment and pay less taxes. It’s a win-win situation especially for labour class and also to the entrepreneurs (although less rewarding than outsourcing).

We keep hearing about Donald Trump’s derogatory comments about women, however we must also understand the fact that this person by birth and profession is not a political person and he never intended to enter into politics till the time the US economy has run into a situation in which it is at the moment. Till then he was perfectly acting as a common human being. I think every human deserves a second chance especially when he is intending to bring big dramatic and positive change to the society.
I am sure many women US citizens would understand what am I trying to say here.

To be continued…

BREXIT: some points in the favour of ‘LEAVE’ campaign

After listening to the ‘EU referendum’ on the BBC last night, I felt that I’m little bit well informed about what British people to gain if they decide to leave EU.

1> Although the global markets and the economies are undergoing lots of tension, if Britain is separated I think within 1.5-2 years time it would be able to solve most of the problems the country would be facing including the haul of labour to support its economy by formulating and executing its own immigration policy in alliance with business lobby there.

2> One more thing came to my notice based on the debate held yesterday that due to uncontrolled immigration, over the period of time the wage rate in the UK has fallen which would eventually impact the quality of life of the general public. Low wage rates are eventually adding to the pockets of fatty capitalists, which is like a cancer in the long run to any economy.

3> I was astonished to know that the Bank of England has limited options to take any sort of measures to take control of the UK Economy in the EU. If I understand the situation well the situation would only worsen over the period of time.

4> No doubt, that the UK Economy would be in trouble once they are out of the EU. But the question is how long would they let the problems linger over their head, given their freedom and autonomy is back in their own hands. I look at this situation as someone spending his/ her all life working for someone by being in the service (to serve the EU administration), in contrast to someone who is trying to start and run his/ her own business. Of course, choosing to be in the service always be more comfortable and easy choice however in the long run one’s own life ends servicing and working for someone else’s dreams, whereas if someone chose to do a business, initially he/ she may face hurdles but that is what the Country as an Institution stands for. With all the Brits together working for the common goal of country’s prosperity would be in a better position to chose what is right and not, to prosper eventually.

5> From the national security perspective, I believe that the Great Britain would be more safe and secure by being remain separated from the huge continental land of Europe, the face of which is changing since 2013 with the large influx of people from Syria, Africa and Iraq.

6> Recession! Recession! Recession! I don’t understand why people are being scared to fall into recession after being exited from the EU. On one side people favoring ‘stay’ in EU are saying that there would be a big haul of labour, which indirectly means more demand for labour within Britain in a short period of time, which would help them restore their wage rates to support good standard of life. Probably this would not go in the favour of small number of rich and capitalist people. Any nation with a good banking system and entrepreneurs would eventually be able to come out of recession in 2-3 years period of time. The recession is just an economic cycle. However I think this fear of recession should not hold ground because of having a labour haul on one side and also demands of the society to be met on the other.

I think if Brits chose to leave it would be definitely in the interest of coming generations of British people.

And as far as EU is concerned I am sure that it would prosper on its own.

IPL 2016: Sir M. S. Dhoni (RSG)

I am kind of compelled to write today due to my faith in Sir M. S. Dhoni and the phase through which he has gone through in the ongoing IPL so far. It was not pleasant sight to see Dhoni during the presentation ceremony after that match with Gujarat Lions. One thing all Dhoni followers and India must understand that his team of Chennai Super Kings (CSK) which had consistently performed well in the prior IPL tournaments does not exist and has been split. Thus he has been left with new squad which would be expected to take its time to perform. Thus two teams are quite young in this IPL tournament viz. Gujarat Lions and Rising Super Giants. Looking at Gujarat Lions the side looks to be quite balanced especially due to McCullum, Finch, Bravo, Raina, Jadeja all are performing quite good and well supported by the rest of the squad. In the case of RSG I felt that they have got the right combination now that after KP got injured and got replaced by Albie Morkel. Despite this RSG failed to perform to bring victory home in its match against KKR. The reasons I felt was Ashwin looked helpless with his two overs. M. Ashwin and the other left arm spinner could have tried to bowl round the wicket, maintaining stump attack while ball was spinning well and the wicket was also quite dry. It is always difficult for the right handed batsman to hit the ball pitching on the left corner or sometimes outside the peripheral vision. ***Also Albie Morkel could have kept batsmen surprising by changing the length rather trying to bowl full pitch to get wicket, especially considering that conditions were not in favor of swing bowling***.RSG could have tried to build the pressure on the KKR with the increasing required run rate. Still I would like to give RSG a credit for the first match with the new UNIT/ TEAM. Only message I have for Sir M S Dhoni is that we would like to see his team making strong come back from this moment in this IPL. My best wishes to RSG.

ICC T20 World Cup final between England and West Indies

Thoroughly enjoyed this final game of 2016 T20 ICC World Cup and was mad shouting and supporting West Indian team for their outstanding team and fighting performance after a long long time. I wanted West Indies to win this game more than usual mainly because of insensible comments by Mark Nocholas in a column for ESPNcricinfo on March 3 as "West Indies are short of brains but have IPL history in their ranks." Also when WI was batting, Willey was trying to imitate D J Bravo’s dance on champion song.  To be honest, it never suited Willey to dance like that. Maybe Willey should admit that he is not a good dancer. The adversity from which West Indies team came up as a World Champion, I am sure England or no other team for that matter could have shown guts to play for their own nation. It shows that the head and the heart of West Indian players right in their places and functioning well in harmony in the interest of their nation. I think now Marc Nicholas has to question himself if that statement was meant for West Indies or for England? Cricket is the game innovated by England however for long time England was not playing competitive enough to be even close to be called World Champions until T20 was launched and innovated. This year West Indies has won 3 world cups viz: under 19, women’s T20 and men’s T20. So who is the best executioner? Certainly not England. That statement by Mark was sheerly uncalled for. And I am so happy that WI gave a strong answer to him by their performance. I was also overwhelmed by the team spirit and performance which WI team showed in the middle of negative forces coming from the WI Cricket Board itself. I am thrilled, entertained and awed by the performance of Marlon Samules, Carlos Brathwaite. I only wish that no matter how many differences West Indies camp has with the Board or amongst the players, they should always come together in the interest of their nation, to entertain people who like to watch WI perform at its best and to come out victorious as world champion in any form of cricket. It leaves no doubt that WI is full of cricketing skills and potential. And the reason I always like watching them play and win is because they enjoy the game, they play in true spirit of the game and don’t indulge in activities other than cricket to try to overcome their opponents. They try to have fun on the ground and also bring joy and happiness to the people who love this game. Finally, the last but not the least, a special thanks to Dada Ganguly for offering such a nice, balanced wicket to hold the final game, which turned out to be the most entertaining and thrilling end for this wonderful cricket event.

ICC T20 World Cup semi-final between India and West Indies

I’m little late to write about this however cannot stay without. I heartily congratulate West Indies for its wonderful performance in all three departments i.e. bowling, fielding and batting. 

I would like to highlight some of the mistakes Indian team made yesterday.
1^st and foremost mistake was of dropping Shikhar Dhawan on the Wankhede wicket known as batsmen’s paradise. Shikhar could have scored runs at much better acceleration than Ajinkya Rahane. Ajinkya’s role comes into picture when India tends to lose wickets at short intervals and on tough turning Indian wicket. We all presume Ajinkya to be on the path of living legend Rahul Dravid, although he has lot to achieve and prove in order to be considered as replacement of Rahul Dravid. Ajinkya suits well in the middle order to gain control of the game especially when India has lost momentum and also wickets. Ajinkya would have been better replacement for Suresh Raina who failed miserably in this world cup. Manish Pandey was a good addition to replace Yuvaraj I feel, however unfortunately he did not get chance to shine his bat.
2^nd mistake was, I found Virat Kohli and Ajinkya Rahane got too complacent in the middle overs till the time Ajinkya got out and were happy with 1s and 2s. Once again I would like to highlight the fact that the venue was the Wankhede and not the Eden Garden. Both should have stepped on the gas. Everyone would agree that West Indies scored most of its runs through 4s and 6s and yet won comfortably. India should have focused for minimum 225 runs to defend. 
3^rd mistake was to give Ravindra Jadeja 4 overs who was thrashed at the run rate of 12 runs per over. Although M S Dhoni did mention in the post match conference that the ball was wet due to dew on the ground I did not see any fielder carrying napkin or something to dry up the ball frequently in order to help bowlers to get good grip on the ball. Legendary leg spinner Shane Warne used to carry white napkin on the ground in conditions where ball used to get wet. 

Although I am an Indian, yesterday I did enjoy clean performance by the West Indies team, especially after losing Chris Gayle. In depth overs also West Indian bowlers did not give enough chance to Indian Batsmen and kept changing line, bowling repetitively just inside the wide line, kept deceiving with the pace of the ball, making it tough for Virat and M S Dhoni to hit for 4s and 6s. And I really felt bad when Virat was to be trusted with his bowling skills in the final over where WI needed only 6 runs. Indian team did commit few mistakes right from the selection of best 11, as best 11 were not on the field. And then second mistake was not to read well the available conditions and make best use of those and also skills in the available squad. It was sad to see Harbhajan on the bench especially when India was losing in India and Ravindra Jadeja bowling.

In the name of love of this sport, best team did win.

ICC T20 WORLD CUP 2016: Quarter Final (for Ind and Aus)

Finally, India has made it to the semis of 2016 T20 Cricket World Cup. Virat has made it possible with the help of Yuvaraj and M. S. Dhoni. Of course bowlers also did well today to restrict Australia to 160 on the batting track especially for the team batting first.

The reason for me to write today is Virat has done it consistently in this tournament and made it possible for India to reach semis. However I feel in these past three victories India has bagged, India may tend to oversee failures in the batting department. Rohit Sharma has failed consistently, although he looked today very composed and willing to contribute, given that Shikhar had gone out early Rohit could have tried to hang on there for little long. Yuvi did put up decent performance of 21 in 18 balls despite his ankle-sprain injury. Raina has failed consistently. There are two players I believe India could have used best to its advantage viz. Ajinkya Rahane and Harbhajan Singh. I believe having Ajinkya in place of Suresh Raina would make middle order more reliable and ease a pressure on Virat as well as Yuvaraj. Having Harbhajan in 11 would be an advantage, because he is a genuine off-spinner and can turn the ball considerably, putting batsman little bit more in trouble to make shots, besides he is a useful batsman and proven pinch-hitter. Most pitches witnessed in this tournament are turning except one or two. Having Harbhajan on Kolakata track would have made more difference for sure. Now Yuvaraj being injured selectors would be forced to chose Ajinkya Rahane but for me the best 11 could have been different.

I wish India to win another T20 World Cup championship this year.